Thursday, January 24, 2008

Rambo

STARRING: Sylvester Stallone
View Trailer

RELEASE DATE: 01/25/2008
DATE SCREENED: 01/23/2008

The Verdict
GOOD - See it in the theater

The first two Rambo films stand as two of the finest examples of ‘80s action flicks. Throughout the ‘80s, Stallone and Schwarzenegger churned out kick-ass action films without the use of CGI special effects. The Rambo series took a downward turn with Part III, in 1988, but it was still entertaining. Stallone did a good job with the last Rocky film, which was better than the previous two sequels, but was not an action film. I had my doubts about whether he could make a successful return to the action film genre at his age and after so many years.

The film starts out with real images of the civil war in Burma, which has been going on for over 30 years. It’s more like a genocide than a civil war. The military has no problem wiping out entire villages. We soon learn that Rambo has been living in Thailand, catching dangerous snakes and selling them. As always, he’s trying to stay out of the way and mind his own business. But it wouldn’t be a Rambo movie unless his peaceful existence was interrupted. This time a group of missionaries need him to escort them to Burma in his boat so that they can help the people. Rambo’s response is that unless they have guns, they can’t help. The missionaries won’t take no for an answer, and eventually the pretty face in the group convinces Rambo to take them to Burma despite his repeated warnings to go home. While this back and forth is going on between Rambo and the missionaries, we get scenes of the Burmese military killing and raping villagers. They are extremely brutal, but that’s only the start of the brutality in this movie.

The missionary’s boat trip is interrupted by thugs who want to rape the only female in the group, who Rambo had taken a liking to. Rambo isn’t about to let that happen and quickly dispatches them. He has clearly not lost his skills. One of the missionaries is upset, claiming that there is never an excuse to take a life, but Rambo grabs him by the throat and is tempted to kill him for his insolence. Rambo drops them off in Burma and heads back home. Only days later, the missionaries end up being captured. A small team of mercenaries is hired for a rescue mission. Rambo is once again asked to make that trip down the river, with the mercenaries. Upon arrival in Burma, Rambo is ordered to stay by the boat. As soon as the mercenaries find themselves confronted by a few military soldiers, Rambo is there for the rescue, using his bow and arrows to pick off the soldiers. Having proven himself, he takes a leadership role in planning the rescue.

The rescue from the military camp and subsequent battle at the river is non-stop ‘80s style brutal violence. This violence is more brutal than what you would see in the ‘80s. Rambo kills people with his bare hands, with knives, and with a large machine gun that can blow off any limb. It’s like you are watching a war, with Rambo raking up the highest body count. The military were shown as being so evil throughout the film that the audience was cheering as Rambo exacted his brutal form of vengeance.

Rambo is not for the feint of heart. The violence is shockingly brutal and right in your face. I even saw people at the screening turn away or cover their eyes. Being such a huge fan of the ‘80s action film, I couldn’t help but enjoy it. I didn’t go expecting a great story. I went to see good action, and that’s what I got. If we had a Rambo in Iraq, that war would be over. Stallone has once again managed to end a movie franchise on a high note. See this one in the theater, assuming you don’t have a weak stomach.

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Untraceable

STARRING: Diane Lane, Colin Hanks
View Trailer

RELEASE DATE: 01/25/2008
DATE SCREENED: 01/22/2008

The Verdict
OK - Wait for the DVD

Before the screening of Untraceable, a couple of FBI agents gave a short recruitment speech and offered to speak with anyone who was interested in joining the FBI after the film. I somehow doubt they ended up with many inquiries, as Untraceable did not strike me as a good FBI propaganda film.

Diane Lane stars as Jennifer Marsh, an FBI agent in the cyber crime division. She works closely with Griffin, played by Tom Hank’s son Colin. They spend most of their days tracking people stealing credit card numbers over the Internet, or posing as an underage girl in order to catch some pedophile. Their usual day is interrupted when a new web site called killwithme.com makes its debut on the web. The site debuts with the murder of a cat, then quickly moves on to people. People are captured, then bound and gagged in some way. Their death is then streamed live through the web site. The more people that log on to the site, the faster some method of torture kills the victim. The FBI is on the case, but despite their best efforts the site can’t be shut down because it is “untraceable”, using some combination of servers in Russia. Although the site is untraceable, the person who runs the site has to physically capture people and also dump the bodies. So he himself is not untraceable. As the FBI begins to close in, Griffin, Jennifer, and her family become the new targets. Jennifer must catch this madman not only because it’s her job, but also to save her family.

The film is trying to make some kind of point about the sick people who scour the internet for footage of live deaths. With each new capture, killwithme becomes more popular. And when the FBI calls a press conference to tell people to avoid the unnamed site, people are more determined to find it. But this point is overshadowed by the contrived plot points that everyone will see coming. This movie makes everything seem easy. It only takes a day to track down and arrest someone stealing credit card information, then it’s easy to set up untraceable web sites in any basement, and then it’s easy to find an FBI agent’s address and family info. I don’t see why FBI recruiters are recruiting after a film that makes it seem easy for a killer to come after an FBI agent. On the positive side, there are some tense moments, and the ending was a definite crowd pleaser. The positive does not outweigh the negative though. Wait for the DVD.

Thursday, January 17, 2008

Cloverfield

STARRING: Michael Stahl-David, Lizzy Caplan
View Trailer

RELEASE DATE: 01/18/2008
DATE SCREENED: 01/15/2008

The Verdict
GOOD - See it in the theater


What is Cloverfield? That is the question I have been asking myself ever since I saw the trailer before a screening of Transformers. That first trailer didn’t even have a title, so I was actually asking “WTF”, as I watched the indelible image of the Statue of Liberty’s head rolling down the street. I had to do a lot of research just to find out the title of the movie. The J.J. Abrams produced film has been shrouded in mystery up until now. This brilliant marketing ploy completely worked on me. I eagerly anticipated this release as much as I would anticipate any summer blockbuster. And now that I’ve seen Cloverfield, I’m asking myself… what does “Cloverfield” mean?

The film opens by saying that this video footage has been found in Central Park. The rest of the film is seen through the lens of this video camera. The cameraman, Hud, is documenting the going away party for Rob, who is moving to Japan. Rob has an argument with his best female friend, Beth, who he has always wanted to be more than friends with. She spent the night in his bed recently, but then showed up at the party with a date. She abruptly leaves after the argument, putting a damper on the party. But that is the least of everyone’s worries. Not long afterward there is a loud noise that grabs everyone’s attention. People run to the roof, where there is a large explosion in the distance. Everyone runs down towards the street, where all hell breaks loose, starting with the Statue of Liberty’s head rolling down the street. Buildings are being knocked down, apparently by a huge monster, and ash is covering the streets of NY like during 9-11. The military is quickly on the scene to evacuate and attack the monster. During the evacuation, Rob gets a call from Beth saying that she is stuck in her apartment. Rob, two female friends, and Hud decide to go rescue her. The tension builds as they must not only evade the path of the huge monster, but escape from smaller creatures that fall off the monster’s back. It becomes a roller coaster ride from there that abruptly ends in about 90 minutes. And I enjoyed the ride!

Going into the film I wasn’t sold on the idea of seeing an entire film from the point of view of a video camera, as I never liked Blair Witch Project. But in Cloverfield, it’s done better than I could have hoped. The cameraman, Hud, is a likeable guy who always has a funny line to release the tension. And there is a lot of tension. At times you are right there as the monster tears down buildings and fends off the military. I wish I could describe the monster, but it’s indescribable. It’s not like anything I’ve seen, and you only see if for brief moments when the camera swings its way. Since Hud is always on the run, or hiding, he doesn’t spend too much time filming the monster.

Some people might be disappointed that they never get to see more of the monster, and nothing dealing with the monster is ever explained. You don’t get those typical scenes of the military explaining things and planning their attack. The movie is all about Rob, Beth, and their 3 friends dealing with this horrible situation. The movie would have been better if all of these twenty-somethings were as likeable as Hud, but the rest of them seem like spoiled, pretty, rich kids that you don’t really care that much about. And the idea that they would be brave enough to go back towards the monster, and into a building that looks like it’s about to fall down, in order to attempt to save Beth is pretty ridiculous. If you don’t think about that too hard you should have fun with this movie. The special effects are completely seamless, as this is a far cry from the old Godzilla movies. This is the movie about the people who ran away from Godzilla in those old movies. It’s very intense, sometimes scary, and very entertaining. It doesn’t completely live up to the hype, but I’d recommend that you see this in the theater. It does bug me that I still have no idea what the title “Cloverfield” means!

Saturday, January 5, 2008

Best & Worst Movies of 2007



10 Favorite Movies of '07
(in no particular order)
10 Worst Movies of '07
(in no particular order)
  • Transformers
  • American Gangster
  • The Great Debaters
  • Beowulf - IMAX 3-D version
  • Live Free or Die Hard
  • Gone Baby Gone
  • Black Snake Moan
  • The Lookout
  • Knocked Up
  • Assassination of Jesse James

  • Blood and Chocolate
  • Reno 911
  • Perfect Stranger
  • Daywatch
  • A Mighty Heart
  • Charlie Bartlett
  • Wristcutters: A Love Story
  • Margot at the Wedding
  • How to Cook Your Life
  • Perfect Holiday